Why Islam never deserved the reputation of terrorisation

This post is being motivated by immediate self interest. I am myself under suspicion from a number of different policing organisations. Not because I pose any real threat to the public, to myself, or to any individual; but because the politicians whom regulate the police through legislative measures, and funding, are biased against folk who believe as I believe.

I will say upfront that the police are notably oblivious to the fact of my credibility in many Muslims contexts, for speaking and writing against terrorism. However, since that reputation is rather being kept anonymous, while my "curaezipidrid" name reputation has been bizarrely misinterepreted, by police and also by those Muslims whom do not believe in every AHadith; I ought to openly here provide the details of what it is that I genuinely believe.

First it is that I believe in Shari'ah and I believe that Shari'ah defines suicide as an illegitimate method of war.

Second it is that I can assert that Judaic thought also supports war as a method when there is need; and that is clearly identified throughout the old testament.

Third it is that Jesus did not actually at any point make any impression that his teaching was for Humanity to always only prevent war being used as a method. He taught us rather of the need for soldiers to die as he.

What I believe in respect of what makes any war legitimate, is that the will of Allah/One God, must be present; and for that willingness to be validated, there needs to manifest a voluntary army.

War by conscription is illegitmate in Kabbalah and Shari'ah. War which is fought by men whom only fight because they are being paid in money to fight is illegitimate in Kabbalah and Shari'ah.

This is because the directive of religious teaching towards the method of war, is for situations in which the men are in despair of any preferable method to war. That happens when men are being prevented from protecting their wives; and/or when mothers are being prevented from protecting their children. Thus the cause of war is clearly that of the mother being prevented from protecting her children, because when a wife is not able to be protected, it is most often because she is willing herself to take very great risks to assert her need to protect her children.

Clearly for a war to be entered into, by the willing nature of the war being regulated through God's will, and thereby it being a war which is fully accountible, there needs to be a social situation in which an army can be raised of men (and perhaps also those women whom, alike to many prostitues, still forgive towards the future rather than the past as is more healthy for women) whom will fight. So the social conditions of the family experience need to be such that war will not worsen those social conditions.

As for the fact of armise of terrorists being active in the world, I want to explain that they methodology is permanently doomed, because they definitively rely upon causing a worsening of the conditions in which war can be legitimised.

Now that I have explained my real belief, I need to say a little in my own defence.

I have a family court case that arose out of a situation in which my children had been visiting with their father for five months and were due to return to me. Previous to that the children had been with me as their primary care giver since birth, and had only seen their father for a few days in the year for the previous three and half years, which is why I had said yes to their visit with him for so long. I needed only really one month to myself, but their father had expressed a want to start the children in a school near to his house. When it was the agreed time at which the children were to return to me, their father suddenly refused, and started to make an accusation against me of paeophilia, which is totally unfounded. He illustrated his accusation to the court by the example of my reminding my sons to remember a toilet wudhu. For those who do not know, that is a rinsing of the gential area under cold water, or otherwise cleansing it (smoke or clean soil can also be used), while internally regarding yourself and your bodily experienced to be committed to Allah. Previously I had asked my children's father to help teach the children the habit for every time they use the toilet, and he had agreed. His case in the family court is relying upon defining myself as insane only because I have connections with the Aboriginal community, among whom there is recognition of my own self as also having Aboriginal ancestry, even though my ancestors "passed as white" for as many as five generations.

Within this legal situation, I had at first assumed it would prove very easy to prove my innocence and obtain the return of my children to my own custody. But it happened that the police intervened on the children's father's side at the outset, and they seem to be avowed to prove themselves to have been correct. The police do not seem to notice that I have made overt efforts to inform them that I will not hold it against them that their original mistake happened; but rather they have been pursuing a course of attempting to prove that I am guilty of things which are totally impossible for myself to have been involved with.

They have me under suspicion for child pornography and terrorism. Any Muslim will known how absolutely absurd the situation is.

Twice I have written a letter to my local member of the Queensland State Parliament about the situation, since, from October 2003, until January 2007, under-funded through legal aid to manage the case. Funding was available only for a conference, not a hearing, and the children's father would not go to conference. The first letter, to Anna Bligh, was not answered. The second letter, after a move of house, to Anastacia Pulaczski referred me back to the legal aid office.

When I wrote to Anastacia it was after meeting her at a public meeting, and I informed her that I am a Muslim. I tried to also inform her in that letter, that the situation had a potential to become inflamatory among the Muslim community, and so it would be best for the situation to be resolved expediently without me needing to ask the Muslim community for support in my case. I also gave her advice about working with the Muslim community in general, and so that it should never arise that there are bad relations between the Australian Goverment and Muslims. But it recently came to my notice that the police whose surveillance I am under, have taking the letter to have been a threatening letter. As though I was trying to threaten the Queensland state government in an act of terrorism. The police have also been policing me in a way that has made it extremely difficult to associate with other Muslims. Also difficult to associate with the local Aboriginal community, and difficult to associate with any socialists.

All that I will further say here about this situation, is that if the Australian police become known to have been preventing the interpretation of Qur'an in which Human society can prevent overloading the atmosphere with too many greenhouse causing gas emissions, . . . ..... it won't be me who needs to make a threat.


“Lose it” instructs what but
A poem born in the frustration of being policed by those whom presume to be able to force me into insanity simply by instruction to lose it, lose that object of their sentence that is.

Lose it they say
But what
To lose did they wed
Since all my sanity
Was already
Stolen from me
And yet remains
Mine and no one who claimed
Of me being insane
Can have taken my real sanity away
That lose what
Must I ask
To who continue to mask
My reality
With their own absurd formality
In which their evidence is
Not what it might be imagine as
But of the multitude of failure in magnitude
Of records kept in memory’s fortitude
That the beginning they tell is well
And the ending not so yet to fell
Is that they blacked out the whole middle
That where they end it
Might not be what reality ends with
So let me warn thus
To whom continue assert the mask
Of their right to hate
What can be proven correct
By denying reality
Its full evidence
I am not the terrorist
Nor prostitute
Nor pornographer
Nor child rapist
They’ve accused me with
But just my own real self
Accommodating all their assertions of else
In my own way collecting
Real evidence
Wondering why it is
That being policed seems to be meaning
Being instructed to lose it if
You happen to witness . . .